Suraj Ka Satvan Ghoda - storytelling at its best !!!

As promised in the last post, here is the review of movie which i think is the BEST STORYTELLING EVER on celluloid.

Directed by Shyam Benegal, it was released in 1993 and won the National Award for Best Feature in Hindi. As most of the Benegal's movies this one too has female character dominance and the plot is actually a correlation of the lives of 3 different women (belonging to poor, middle and intellectual class of society) and this correlation is narrated through a male character, Manek Mullah, superbly played by Rajit Kapoor (remember Byomkeshbakshi :) ).

The movie is based on a novel of same name by "Dharamvir Bharti". If by chance you have read his other novel "Gunaahon Ka Devta" (thanks to choli, i have read it) you will know how beautifully he can capture everything that is good and bad about humans, in a single plot.

The movie is divided into three narrations done by Manek Mullah to his friends, each telling the story of a different woman whom Manek had known in past. The timeframe for all the stories is almost same, even then, in each story viewer gets to see a different aspect of society and Manek's life. Women characters have been played by Neena Gupta (the poor), Pallavi Joshi (the intellectual) and Rajeshwari Sachdev (middle class). Movie also stars Amrish Puri delivering a top notch performance.

It is only Benegal's brilliance that such complex characterisation has been given shape on celluloid in a seemingly simple way. Characters don't tell you to form any notion about them, but still in each story you make some notion just to find out in the next story that there was something missing in your interpretation. All three story unfolds, and you are still not sure whether you have fathomed even one character fully. And then comes the best part, the ending. End scene will leave you spellbounded, in awe of the sheer brilliance of Benegal's direction. This scene makes it one of those movies which haunt you for days. It may (it may not :)) also help you in drawing a conclusion out of the movie. in my case at least, it did. Here is my one line conclusion, lemme know what was yours.

"Society and Conditions are more important than man's aspirations"

BTW this was Rajit Kapoor's first movie. I rellay appreciate Benegal Sir for giving us so many wonderful actors : Shabana Azmi, Om Puri, Girish Kanad, Naseerudin Shah, Smita Patil and many more.

If you really love cinema, DO WATCH this movie. I assure you, it won't disappoint.

Ek Ruka Hua Faisla

it's generally a perception, and albeit a very strong one, that all Indian movies are just about dancing around the trees, playing with silly emotions , and immortal heroes who can never fail. I agree to the dancing part of it (thanks to madhuri for koyal si teri boli :) ), also the exaggeration of emotions (thanks to barjatya for trying all possible permutation, combination of relationships), and thanks to Rajni, heroes ARE immortal in most of the Indian movies.

But the point I disagree with is - ALL Indian movies are like that. NO NO NO. Most of the people, just right away reject even the idea of a CLASS Indian movie. Well we need to dig deeper to find out the real gems. Let me start off with first gem: Ek Ruka Hua Failsa.

Most of the people wouldn't even have heard of this movie and those who have must be knowing that this is a Hollywood adaptation. Agreed, it's an adaptation but that doesn't lessen the greatness of it's director and cast who have put a very sincere and brave effort in producing a stellar piece of work. And if you are not convinced, I will shortly come up with another review, of a movie which IS ORIGINAL, and can beat ANY movie (and that includes the whole world cinema, OSCAR etc etc), by miles in storytelling.

Ek Ruka Hua Faisla is a remake of Twelve Angry Men. Directed by Basu Chatterjee, produced by Doordarshan/NFDC, it was released in 1986. The movie starts in a room, ends in that room itself :) (why do we need switzerland to make a great movie). The story is about the 12 jurors who need to make a decision on a charge of murder against a young man. All of the jury members except for one are convinced that young man is in fact guilty. But till all of them unanimously make a decision, it can not be final. So now the 11 jury members try to convince 1 and then there are rounds of reasonings, discussions, insights, questions, explanations which make up the whole movie.

It's for you to see who convince whom in the end and how.All the actors suite their role to a tee. Pankaj Kapur, as always, is just exceptional (this man is a gem of indian cinema who has not got his worth). Watch it to see how good cinema can be created even in a single room with 12 chairs and a table :)

If you do't find it on DVD, here is the Google video link